[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":158},["ShallowReactive",2],{"post-fr-compte-rendu-du-livre-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner":3,"translation-fr-compte-rendu-du-livre-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner":157},["Reactive",4],{"id":5,"date":6,"date_gmt":7,"guid":8,"modified":10,"modified_gmt":11,"slug":12,"status":13,"type":14,"link":15,"title":16,"content":18,"excerpt":21,"author":23,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":25,"ping_status":25,"sticky":20,"template":26,"format":27,"meta":28,"categories":29,"tags":31,"class_list":33,"_links":41,"_embedded":82,"tagsResolved":143,"translations":144},596,"04. 03. 2018","2018-03-04T00:00:00",{"rendered":9},"https:\u002F\u002Fjakubferenc.cz\u002Farticle\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","2025-07-05T13:36:46","2025-07-05T11:36:46","a-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","publish","post","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner\u002F",{"rendered":17},"A book review of HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction by Phil Turner",{"rendered":19,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For example, Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman and Terry Winograd with Fernando Flores wrote important works criticizing cognitivism and its lacking conceptions of context, society, culture and in general „being-in-the-world“ that are, nevertheless, crucial in interpreting everyday’s actions of human beings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The books presents the overview of cognitivism, followed by individual postcognitivistic approaches such as embodied\u002Fextended\u002Fenactive\u002Fdistributed mind or activity theory. All of them share the view that to understand interaction with technology, we need to deal with contextual factors. Moreover, they all agree that technology plays an important part in our coping with everyday situations and mediating our relation with the world. Technology in the view of postcognitivistic approaches is not a passive brick sitting on our tables, but something that actively shapes our minds and thinking. It enables us to do things otherwise inconceivable for us.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Overall, Phil Turner wrote the book that is a primer for anyone who starts or is already deeply focused on the theoretical approaches to HCI. The HCI fields is becoming truly important, because in the age of ubiquitous computing, internet of things, information and network society, we are immersed in technology with computational capabilities and interfaces. Human-computer interaction therefore has become something of „human-technology-world“ interaction. And for such a leap, new paradigms are needed. Technology is deeply interwoven into our lives, therefore it seems that HCI field starts to become a universal lens through which we can analyze society and humanity at large. Philosophers and theoreticians such as Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser or recently Benjamin Bratton argued forcefully that to analyze society, traditional methods in sociology are no longer sufficient, because increasingly humans interact more with technology than other humans, or the human-human interaction is almost always mediated by technology. To understand our society, we need to understand our relation to technology. Because the old dictum is relevant more than ever: the medium is the message.\u003C\u002Fp>\n",false,{"rendered":22,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For […]\u003C\u002Fp>\n",1,0,"closed","","standard",{"footnotes":26},[30],4,[32],6,[34,14,35,36,37,38,39,40],"post-596","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article","tag-fixed",{"self":42,"collection":48,"about":51,"author":54,"replies":58,"version-history":61,"predecessor-version":64,"wp:attachment":68,"wp:term":71,"curies":78},[43],{"href":44,"targetHints":45},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596",{"allow":46},[47],"GET",[49],{"href":50},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts",[52],{"href":53},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftypes\u002Fpost",[55],{"embeddable":56,"href":57},true,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers\u002F1",[59],{"embeddable":56,"href":60},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcomments?post=596",[62],{"count":23,"href":63},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions",[65],{"id":66,"href":67},852,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions\u002F852",[69],{"href":70},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fmedia?parent=596",[72,75],{"taxonomy":73,"embeddable":56,"href":74},"category","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories?post=596",{"taxonomy":76,"embeddable":56,"href":77},"post_tag","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags?post=596",[79],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},"wp","https:\u002F\u002Fapi.w.org\u002F{rel}",{"author":83,"wp:term":100},[84],{"id":23,"name":85,"url":86,"description":26,"link":87,"slug":85,"avatar_urls":88,"_links":92},"jakubferenc","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwordpress","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fauthor\u002Fjakubferenc\u002F",{"24":89,"48":90,"96":91},"https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=24&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=48&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=96&d=mm&r=g",{"self":93,"collection":97},[94],{"href":57,"targetHints":95},{"allow":96},[47],[98],{"href":99},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers",[101,122],[102],{"id":30,"link":103,"name":104,"slug":104,"taxonomy":73,"_links":105},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fcategory\u002Farticle\u002F","article",{"self":106,"collection":111,"about":114,"wp:post_type":117,"curies":120},[107],{"href":108,"targetHints":109},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories\u002F4",{"allow":110},[47],[112],{"href":113},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories",[115],{"href":116},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fcategory",[118],{"href":119},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?categories=4",[121],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[123],{"id":32,"link":124,"name":125,"slug":125,"taxonomy":76,"_links":126},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Ftag\u002Ffixed\u002F","fixed",{"self":127,"collection":132,"about":135,"wp:post_type":138,"curies":141},[128],{"href":129,"targetHints":130},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags\u002F6",{"allow":131},[47],[133],{"href":134},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags",[136],{"href":137},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fpost_tag",[139],{"href":140},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?tags=6",[142],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[],{"cs":145,"es":149,"fr":153},{"title":146,"slug":147,"description":148},"Recenze knihy HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction od Phila Turnera","recenze-knihy-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-od-phila-turnera","Recenze knihy Phila Turnera o postkognitivistických přístupech k HCI a o tom, proč se interakce člověka s technologií stává klíčem k porozumění společnosti.",{"title":150,"slug":151,"description":152},"Reseña del libro HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction, de Phil Turner","resena-del-libro-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Reseña del libro de Phil Turner sobre los enfoques poscognitivistas de la HCI y sobre por qué la interacción con la tecnología es clave para entender la sociedad.",{"title":154,"slug":155,"description":156},"Compte rendu du livre HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction de Phil Turner","compte-rendu-du-livre-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Compte rendu du livre de Phil Turner sur les approches postcognitivistes de la HCI et sur les raisons pour lesquelles l’interaction avec la technique éclaire la société.","\u003Cp>Phil Turner a écrit le livre dont on avait besoin. Le domaine de l’interaction homme-machine est, depuis ses débuts, fortement influencé par les sciences cognitives et par leur paradigme du « cognitivisme », qui envisage l’esprit humain à travers la métaphore d’un processeur d’ordinateur, plus précisément comme une unité de traitement de l’information. Le cognitivisme en tant que paradigme a cependant été attaqué par beaucoup. Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman ou Terry Winograd avec Fernando Flores, par exemple, ont écrit des ouvrages importants qui critiquent le cognitivisme et ses conceptions lacunaires du contexte, de la société, de la culture et, plus généralement, de l’« être-au-monde », lesquelles sont pourtant cruciales pour interpréter les actions quotidiennes des êtres humains.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Le livre présente un panorama du cognitivisme, suivi des différentes approches postcognitivistes, telles que l’esprit incarné\u002Fétendu\u002Fénactif\u002Fdistribué ou la théorie de l’activité. Toutes partagent l’idée que, pour comprendre l’interaction avec la technique, nous devons prendre en compte les facteurs contextuels. Toutes s’accordent en outre à dire que la technique joue un rôle important dans notre manière de faire face aux situations quotidiennes et qu’elle médiatise notre rapport au monde. La technique, du point de vue des approches postcognitivistes, n’est pas une brique passive posée sur nos tables, mais bien quelque chose qui façonne activement notre esprit et notre pensée. Elle nous permet de faire des choses qui, autrement, nous seraient inconcevables.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Dans l’ensemble, Phil Turner a écrit un livre qui sert d’introduction à quiconque débute dans les approches théoriques de la HCI ou s’y consacre déjà en profondeur. Le domaine de la HCI devient véritablement important, car à l’ère de l’informatique ubiquitaire, de l’internet des objets, de la société de l’information et des réseaux, nous sommes immergés dans une technique dotée de capacités de calcul et d’interfaces. L’interaction homme-machine est donc devenue une sorte d’interaction « humain-technique-monde ». Et un tel saut exige de nouveaux paradigmes. La technique est profondément tissée dans nos vies, si bien qu’il semble que le domaine de la HCI commence à devenir une lentille universelle à travers laquelle nous pouvons analyser la société et l’humanité dans son ensemble. Des philosophes et des théoriciens comme Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser ou, plus récemment, Benjamin Bratton ont soutenu avec force que, pour analyser la société, les méthodes traditionnelles de la sociologie ne suffisent plus, car les humains interagissent de plus en plus avec la technique plutôt qu’avec d’autres humains, ou bien l’interaction entre humains est presque toujours médiatisée par la technique. Pour comprendre notre société, nous devons comprendre notre rapport à la technique. Car le vieil adage est plus pertinent que jamais : le médium est le message.\u003C\u002Fp>",1790905684371]