[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":158},["ShallowReactive",2],{"post-es-resena-del-libro-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner":3,"translation-es-resena-del-libro-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner":157},["Reactive",4],{"id":5,"date":6,"date_gmt":7,"guid":8,"modified":10,"modified_gmt":11,"slug":12,"status":13,"type":14,"link":15,"title":16,"content":18,"excerpt":21,"author":23,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":25,"ping_status":25,"sticky":20,"template":26,"format":27,"meta":28,"categories":29,"tags":31,"class_list":33,"_links":41,"_embedded":82,"tagsResolved":143,"translations":144},596,"04. 03. 2018","2018-03-04T00:00:00",{"rendered":9},"https:\u002F\u002Fjakubferenc.cz\u002Farticle\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","2025-07-05T13:36:46","2025-07-05T11:36:46","a-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","publish","post","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner\u002F",{"rendered":17},"A book review of HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction by Phil Turner",{"rendered":19,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For example, Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman and Terry Winograd with Fernando Flores wrote important works criticizing cognitivism and its lacking conceptions of context, society, culture and in general „being-in-the-world“ that are, nevertheless, crucial in interpreting everyday’s actions of human beings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The books presents the overview of cognitivism, followed by individual postcognitivistic approaches such as embodied\u002Fextended\u002Fenactive\u002Fdistributed mind or activity theory. All of them share the view that to understand interaction with technology, we need to deal with contextual factors. Moreover, they all agree that technology plays an important part in our coping with everyday situations and mediating our relation with the world. Technology in the view of postcognitivistic approaches is not a passive brick sitting on our tables, but something that actively shapes our minds and thinking. It enables us to do things otherwise inconceivable for us.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Overall, Phil Turner wrote the book that is a primer for anyone who starts or is already deeply focused on the theoretical approaches to HCI. The HCI fields is becoming truly important, because in the age of ubiquitous computing, internet of things, information and network society, we are immersed in technology with computational capabilities and interfaces. Human-computer interaction therefore has become something of „human-technology-world“ interaction. And for such a leap, new paradigms are needed. Technology is deeply interwoven into our lives, therefore it seems that HCI field starts to become a universal lens through which we can analyze society and humanity at large. Philosophers and theoreticians such as Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser or recently Benjamin Bratton argued forcefully that to analyze society, traditional methods in sociology are no longer sufficient, because increasingly humans interact more with technology than other humans, or the human-human interaction is almost always mediated by technology. To understand our society, we need to understand our relation to technology. Because the old dictum is relevant more than ever: the medium is the message.\u003C\u002Fp>\n",false,{"rendered":22,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For […]\u003C\u002Fp>\n",1,0,"closed","","standard",{"footnotes":26},[30],4,[32],6,[34,14,35,36,37,38,39,40],"post-596","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article","tag-fixed",{"self":42,"collection":48,"about":51,"author":54,"replies":58,"version-history":61,"predecessor-version":64,"wp:attachment":68,"wp:term":71,"curies":78},[43],{"href":44,"targetHints":45},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596",{"allow":46},[47],"GET",[49],{"href":50},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts",[52],{"href":53},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftypes\u002Fpost",[55],{"embeddable":56,"href":57},true,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers\u002F1",[59],{"embeddable":56,"href":60},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcomments?post=596",[62],{"count":23,"href":63},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions",[65],{"id":66,"href":67},852,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions\u002F852",[69],{"href":70},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fmedia?parent=596",[72,75],{"taxonomy":73,"embeddable":56,"href":74},"category","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories?post=596",{"taxonomy":76,"embeddable":56,"href":77},"post_tag","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags?post=596",[79],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},"wp","https:\u002F\u002Fapi.w.org\u002F{rel}",{"author":83,"wp:term":100},[84],{"id":23,"name":85,"url":86,"description":26,"link":87,"slug":85,"avatar_urls":88,"_links":92},"jakubferenc","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwordpress","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fauthor\u002Fjakubferenc\u002F",{"24":89,"48":90,"96":91},"https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=24&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=48&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=96&d=mm&r=g",{"self":93,"collection":97},[94],{"href":57,"targetHints":95},{"allow":96},[47],[98],{"href":99},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers",[101,122],[102],{"id":30,"link":103,"name":104,"slug":104,"taxonomy":73,"_links":105},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fcategory\u002Farticle\u002F","article",{"self":106,"collection":111,"about":114,"wp:post_type":117,"curies":120},[107],{"href":108,"targetHints":109},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories\u002F4",{"allow":110},[47],[112],{"href":113},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories",[115],{"href":116},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fcategory",[118],{"href":119},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?categories=4",[121],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[123],{"id":32,"link":124,"name":125,"slug":125,"taxonomy":76,"_links":126},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Ftag\u002Ffixed\u002F","fixed",{"self":127,"collection":132,"about":135,"wp:post_type":138,"curies":141},[128],{"href":129,"targetHints":130},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags\u002F6",{"allow":131},[47],[133],{"href":134},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags",[136],{"href":137},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fpost_tag",[139],{"href":140},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?tags=6",[142],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[],{"cs":145,"es":149,"fr":153},{"title":146,"slug":147,"description":148},"Recenze knihy HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction od Phila Turnera","recenze-knihy-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-od-phila-turnera","Recenze knihy Phila Turnera o postkognitivistických přístupech k HCI a o tom, proč se interakce člověka s technologií stává klíčem k porozumění společnosti.",{"title":150,"slug":151,"description":152},"Reseña del libro HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction, de Phil Turner","resena-del-libro-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Reseña del libro de Phil Turner sobre los enfoques poscognitivistas de la HCI y sobre por qué la interacción con la tecnología es clave para entender la sociedad.",{"title":154,"slug":155,"description":156},"Compte rendu du livre HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction de Phil Turner","compte-rendu-du-livre-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Compte rendu du livre de Phil Turner sur les approches postcognitivistes de la HCI et sur les raisons pour lesquelles l’interaction avec la technique éclaire la société.","\u003Cp>Phil Turner escribió el libro que hacía falta. El campo de la interacción persona-ordenador ha estado, desde sus inicios, fuertemente influido por la ciencia cognitiva y su paradigma del «cognitivismo», que contempla la mente humana a través de la metáfora de un procesador informático, más concretamente como una unidad de procesamiento de información. Sin embargo, el cognitivismo como paradigma ha sido atacado por muchos. Por ejemplo, Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman y Terry Winograd junto con Fernando Flores escribieron obras importantes que critican el cognitivismo y sus deficientes concepciones del contexto, la sociedad, la cultura y, en general, del «ser-en-el-mundo», que son, no obstante, cruciales para interpretar las acciones cotidianas de los seres humanos.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>El libro ofrece un panorama del cognitivismo, seguido de los distintos enfoques poscognitivistas, como la mente corporeizada\u002Fextendida\u002Fenactiva\u002Fdistribuida o la teoría de la actividad. Todos ellos comparten la idea de que, para entender la interacción con la tecnología, tenemos que ocuparnos de los factores contextuales. Además, todos coinciden en que la tecnología desempeña un papel importante en nuestra manera de afrontar las situaciones cotidianas y media nuestra relación con el mundo. La tecnología, desde el punto de vista de los enfoques poscognitivistas, no es un ladrillo pasivo que descansa sobre nuestras mesas, sino algo que moldea activamente nuestra mente y nuestro pensamiento. Nos permite hacer cosas que de otro modo nos resultarían inconcebibles.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>En definitiva, Phil Turner ha escrito un libro que sirve de introducción para cualquiera que se esté iniciando en los enfoques teóricos de la HCI o que ya esté profundamente centrado en ellos. El campo de la HCI está adquiriendo una importancia real, porque en la era de la computación ubicua, del internet de las cosas, de la sociedad de la información y de la red, estamos inmersos en una tecnología con capacidades computacionales e interfaces. Por ello, la interacción persona-ordenador se ha convertido en algo así como una interacción «humano-tecnología-mundo». Y para semejante salto hacen falta nuevos paradigmas. La tecnología está profundamente entretejida en nuestras vidas; por eso parece que el campo de la HCI empieza a convertirse en una lente universal a través de la cual podemos analizar la sociedad y la humanidad en su conjunto. Filósofos y teóricos como Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser o, más recientemente, Benjamin Bratton han defendido con vehemencia que, para analizar la sociedad, los métodos tradicionales de la sociología ya no bastan, porque los seres humanos interactúan cada vez más con la tecnología que con otros seres humanos, o bien la interacción entre humanos está casi siempre mediada por la tecnología. Para entender nuestra sociedad, necesitamos entender nuestra relación con la tecnología. Porque el viejo dictum es más pertinente que nunca: el medio es el mensaje.\u003C\u002Fp>",1790905691263]