[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":158},["ShallowReactive",2],{"post-cz-recenze-knihy-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-od-phila-turnera":3,"translation-cz-recenze-knihy-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-od-phila-turnera":157},["Reactive",4],{"id":5,"date":6,"date_gmt":7,"guid":8,"modified":10,"modified_gmt":11,"slug":12,"status":13,"type":14,"link":15,"title":16,"content":18,"excerpt":21,"author":23,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":25,"ping_status":25,"sticky":20,"template":26,"format":27,"meta":28,"categories":29,"tags":31,"class_list":33,"_links":41,"_embedded":82,"tagsResolved":143,"translations":144},596,"04. 03. 2018","2018-03-04T00:00:00",{"rendered":9},"https:\u002F\u002Fjakubferenc.cz\u002Farticle\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","2025-07-05T13:36:46","2025-07-05T11:36:46","a-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner","publish","post","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fa-book-review-of-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-by-phil-turner\u002F",{"rendered":17},"A book review of HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction by Phil Turner",{"rendered":19,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For example, Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman and Terry Winograd with Fernando Flores wrote important works criticizing cognitivism and its lacking conceptions of context, society, culture and in general „being-in-the-world“ that are, nevertheless, crucial in interpreting everyday’s actions of human beings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The books presents the overview of cognitivism, followed by individual postcognitivistic approaches such as embodied\u002Fextended\u002Fenactive\u002Fdistributed mind or activity theory. All of them share the view that to understand interaction with technology, we need to deal with contextual factors. Moreover, they all agree that technology plays an important part in our coping with everyday situations and mediating our relation with the world. Technology in the view of postcognitivistic approaches is not a passive brick sitting on our tables, but something that actively shapes our minds and thinking. It enables us to do things otherwise inconceivable for us.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Overall, Phil Turner wrote the book that is a primer for anyone who starts or is already deeply focused on the theoretical approaches to HCI. The HCI fields is becoming truly important, because in the age of ubiquitous computing, internet of things, information and network society, we are immersed in technology with computational capabilities and interfaces. Human-computer interaction therefore has become something of „human-technology-world“ interaction. And for such a leap, new paradigms are needed. Technology is deeply interwoven into our lives, therefore it seems that HCI field starts to become a universal lens through which we can analyze society and humanity at large. Philosophers and theoreticians such as Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser or recently Benjamin Bratton argued forcefully that to analyze society, traditional methods in sociology are no longer sufficient, because increasingly humans interact more with technology than other humans, or the human-human interaction is almost always mediated by technology. To understand our society, we need to understand our relation to technology. Because the old dictum is relevant more than ever: the medium is the message.\u003C\u002Fp>\n",false,{"rendered":22,"protected":20},"\u003Cp>Phil Turner wrote the book that was needed. Human-computer interaction field has been since its inception influenced heavily by cognitive science and its paradigm of „cognitivism“ that views the human mind through the metaphor of a computer processor, more specifically as an information-processing unit. However cognitivism as a paradigm has been attacked by many. For [&hellip;]\u003C\u002Fp>\n",1,0,"closed","","standard",{"footnotes":26},[30],4,[32],6,[34,14,35,36,37,38,39,40],"post-596","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article","tag-fixed",{"self":42,"collection":48,"about":51,"author":54,"replies":58,"version-history":61,"predecessor-version":64,"wp:attachment":68,"wp:term":71,"curies":78},[43],{"href":44,"targetHints":45},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596",{"allow":46},[47],"GET",[49],{"href":50},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts",[52],{"href":53},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftypes\u002Fpost",[55],{"embeddable":56,"href":57},true,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers\u002F1",[59],{"embeddable":56,"href":60},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcomments?post=596",[62],{"count":23,"href":63},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions",[65],{"id":66,"href":67},852,"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts\u002F596\u002Frevisions\u002F852",[69],{"href":70},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fmedia?parent=596",[72,75],{"taxonomy":73,"embeddable":56,"href":74},"category","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories?post=596",{"taxonomy":76,"embeddable":56,"href":77},"post_tag","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags?post=596",[79],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},"wp","https:\u002F\u002Fapi.w.org\u002F{rel}",{"author":83,"wp:term":100},[84],{"id":23,"name":85,"url":86,"description":26,"link":87,"slug":85,"avatar_urls":88,"_links":92},"jakubferenc","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwordpress","https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fauthor\u002Fjakubferenc\u002F",{"24":89,"48":90,"96":91},"https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=24&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=48&d=mm&r=g","https:\u002F\u002Fsecure.gravatar.com\u002Favatar\u002Fbe0a3bc58c835417264df524152162a21507cbbd47b541b516705d259a516c1f?s=96&d=mm&r=g",{"self":93,"collection":97},[94],{"href":57,"targetHints":95},{"allow":96},[47],[98],{"href":99},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fusers",[101,122],[102],{"id":30,"link":103,"name":104,"slug":104,"taxonomy":73,"_links":105},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fcategory\u002Farticle\u002F","article",{"self":106,"collection":111,"about":114,"wp:post_type":117,"curies":120},[107],{"href":108,"targetHints":109},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories\u002F4",{"allow":110},[47],[112],{"href":113},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fcategories",[115],{"href":116},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fcategory",[118],{"href":119},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?categories=4",[121],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[123],{"id":32,"link":124,"name":125,"slug":125,"taxonomy":76,"_links":126},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Ftag\u002Ffixed\u002F","fixed",{"self":127,"collection":132,"about":135,"wp:post_type":138,"curies":141},[128],{"href":129,"targetHints":130},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags\u002F6",{"allow":131},[47],[133],{"href":134},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftags",[136],{"href":137},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftaxonomies\u002Fpost_tag",[139],{"href":140},"https:\u002F\u002Fcms.local.test\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fposts?tags=6",[142],{"name":80,"href":81,"templated":56},[],{"cs":145,"es":149,"fr":153},{"title":146,"slug":147,"description":148},"Recenze knihy HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction od Phila Turnera","recenze-knihy-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-od-phila-turnera","Recenze knihy Phila Turnera o postkognitivistických přístupech k HCI a o tom, proč se interakce člověka s technologií stává klíčem k porozumění společnosti.",{"title":150,"slug":151,"description":152},"Reseña del libro HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction, de Phil Turner","resena-del-libro-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Reseña del libro de Phil Turner sobre los enfoques poscognitivistas de la HCI y sobre por qué la interacción con la tecnología es clave para entender la sociedad.",{"title":154,"slug":155,"description":156},"Compte rendu du livre HCI Redux: The Promise of Post-Cognitive Interaction de Phil Turner","compte-rendu-du-livre-hci-redux-the-promise-of-post-cognitive-interaction-de-phil-turner","Compte rendu du livre de Phil Turner sur les approches postcognitivistes de la HCI et sur les raisons pour lesquelles l’interaction avec la technique éclaire la société.","\u003Cp>Phil Turner napsal knihu, která chyběla. Obor interakce člověka s počítačem je od svého vzniku silně ovlivněn kognitivní vědou a jejím paradigmatem „kognitivismu“, které nahlíží lidskou mysl skrze metaforu počítačového procesoru, konkrétněji jako jednotku zpracovávající informace. Kognitivismus jako paradigma však mnozí napadali. Například Hubert Dreyfus, Lucy Suchman a Terry Winograd s Fernandem Floresem napsali důležitá díla, jež kritizují kognitivismus a jeho nedostatečné pojetí kontextu, společnosti, kultury a obecně „bytí-ve-světě“, které jsou přitom pro interpretaci každodenního jednání lidských bytostí klíčové.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Kniha podává přehled kognitivismu, po němž následují jednotlivé postkognitivistické přístupy, jako je vtělená\u002Frozšířená\u002Fenaktivní\u002Fdistribuovaná mysl či teorie činnosti. Všechny sdílejí názor, že abychom porozuměli interakci s technologií, musíme se zabývat kontextuálními faktory. Navíc se všechny shodují v tom, že technologie hraje důležitou roli v tom, jak zvládáme každodenní situace, a že zprostředkovává náš vztah ke světu. Technologie z pohledu postkognitivistických přístupů není pasivní cihla ležící na našich stolech, nýbrž něco, co aktivně formuje naši mysl a myšlení. Umožňuje nám dělat věci, které by pro nás jinak byly nemyslitelné.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Celkově vzato napsal Phil Turner knihu, která je úvodem pro každého, kdo s teoretickými přístupy k HCI začíná nebo se jim už hluboce věnuje. Obor HCI nabývá skutečně na důležitosti, protože ve věku ubiquitous computingu, internetu věcí, informační a síťové společnosti jsme ponořeni do technologie, která má výpočetní schopnosti a interface. Interakce člověka s počítačem se proto stala čímsi jako interakcí „člověk–technologie–svět“. A pro takový skok jsou potřeba nová paradigmata. Technologie je hluboce protkána našimi životy, a proto se zdá, že obor HCI se začíná stávat univerzální optikou, skrze niž můžeme analyzovat společnost a lidstvo jako celek. Filosofové a teoretici jako Gilbert Simondon, Vilém Flusser či v poslední době Benjamin Bratton důrazně argumentovali, že k analýze společnosti už tradiční sociologické metody nestačí, protože lidé stále častěji interagují spíše s technologií než s jinými lidmi, nebo je interakce mezi lidmi téměř vždy zprostředkována technologií. Abychom porozuměli naší společnosti, musíme porozumět našemu vztahu k technologii. Neboť staré rčení platí víc než kdy dřív: médium je poselství.\u003C\u002Fp>",1790905677489]